Skip to main content

Our process

How we actually run delivery, and where we leave the textbook

Agile in the sense that matters — short cycles, working software, and changing direction on evidence. Not in the sense of running every ceremony and shipping quarterly.

The situation

Agile in name

A great many organisations run standups, sprints and retrospectives, and deliver no faster than before. The ceremonies are not the method; they are what is left when the method is dropped.

  • Sprints that end with work carried over every time
  • A backlog nobody has ordered by value
  • Demos with slides instead of working software
  • Estimates treated as commitments and then as blame
  • Retrospectives raising the same issue for months
  • A release process too slow to keep up with the sprints

What it covers

What we actually do

  • Short cycles with working software

    Every iteration ends with something that runs and can be used. A demo that is a presentation is not evidence of progress.

  • Work ordered by value and risk

    The riskiest and most valuable things first, so the expensive unknowns surface while there is still time.

  • Slices small enough to finish

    Work sized to complete within a cycle, which does more for predictability than any estimation technique.

  • One accountable owner

    A named person on your side who can decide. Delivery stalls on unavailable decisions more often than on technical problems.

  • A release process that keeps up

    Automated deployment, because short cycles are pointless if releasing takes a month.

  • Honest reporting

    Status that reflects reality, including when reality is unwelcome. That is the only kind worth having.

How we work

A cycle, end to end

Two weeks is our usual rhythm, adjusted where the work genuinely calls for something else.

  1. Plan

    Agree what will be delivered this cycle, sized so it can actually be finished rather than optimistically filled.

  2. Build

    Develop, test and integrate continuously rather than leaving testing to the last two days.

  3. Show

    Working software, in your hands, not a screenshot. This is the point at which misunderstandings surface.

  4. Adjust

    Change the plan on what was learned. A plan that never changes is not being informed by anything.

Outcomes

What this gives you

  • Working software every cycle, not at the end
  • Problems visible early, while options remain
  • The ability to change priority without renegotiating everything
  • Predictability from finishing small things, not from estimates
  • Reporting you can act on rather than reassure yourself with
  • The option to stop with value already delivered

Common questions

Questions we are usually asked

  • No. It means the scope flexes rather than the date or the quality. Fixed-date, fixed-budget work is entirely compatible with iterative delivery — what cannot be fixed simultaneously is date, budget and scope, and pretending otherwise is what produces the late, over-budget projects agile was a reaction to.

Talk to someone who has built this

Not a salesperson working from a form. Tell us what the problem looks like and someone who has delivered this kind of work will come back to you, usually within one working day.

Book a free consultation

Tell us what you need

No obligation, and nothing is shared outside Geecon Global.

Not sure where to start?

We will use these details only to reply to you. See our privacy policy.

Related

Where this usually connects